• Home
  • Trends
  • Company News
  • Product News
  • Fashion
  • Podcast
  • Events
  • About
  • Contact
  • March 9, 2021

Wearable Tech Insider

The Inside Word on Wearables and Wearable Technology

You are here: Home / Trends / How Accurate Are Walking Trackers? A Report from CES 2017

How Accurate Are Walking Trackers? A Report from CES 2017

January 9, 2017 By Dan Rosenbaum

ces-2017-walking-graphFor the last few CES shows, we’ve been strapping on as many fitness trackers as would fit on our wrists, hitting the floors and conference rooms, and comparing results. We don’t expect accuracy — we don’t do a manual count of steps — but we hope for a degree of consistency. When we first did this three years ago, trackers showed error of more than 35 percent, which meant the data they were generating was essentially worthless. This year, results are far better.

We collected five data points a day for five days: from the Apple Watch’s Activity app, the iPhone 6’s Health app, a Fitbit Charge 2, a Garmin Fenix 3HR, and a Samsung Gear 2. The Watch and the Fitbit were on the left wrist, the Garmin and the Gear were on the right. The phone was in one pocket or another or in our hand. We couldn’t get the Garmin to work until the beginning of Day 3, and the Day 3 figures are probably a couple of hundred steps low because the device wouldn’t sync and start counting until it had been in motion outdoors for several minutes.

The graph of the results appears above, and the full data set follows.

All five devices generally agreed with each other, deviating daily between 1.5 and 5 percent. Even that 5 percent figure is an outlier; the next-highest daily standard deviation was 3.9 percent. Interestingly, the more steps the devices counted, the closer the fit was.

Over the five days, some patterns did emerge. Apple’s Health app — the one from the iPhone — was the least consistent, reading significantly higher or lower than the mean for three out of five days. The Fitbit Charge 2 consistently read one standard deviation higher than the mean. The Samsung Gear Fit 2 tended to read a little low, sometimes by an entire standard deviation. But the Apple Watch and the Garmin Fenix 3HR were consistently very tight to the five-device average, particularly when you take into account the Garmin’s first-day undercount.

There was no correlation between which wrist a device was on and its tightness to the mean.

Again, this isn’t a measure of accuracy, although the numbers are consistent enough that they’re highly informative and believable. The fact that five devices from four different vendors are in such substantial agreement may well be good enough for most purposes.

The full data set follows. Yes, our legs still hurt.

Day 1 Day 2 Day 3 Day 4 Day 5
Apple Watch (Activity) 9822 12606 16611 18349 20437
Apple iPhone 6 (Health) 9341 11593 17476 18629 20590
Fitbit Charge 2 10250 13088 17218 18494 21137
Garmin Fenix 3HR 16218 18574 20630
Samsung Gear Fit 2 9988 12360 16211 17941 19915
Daily Mean 9,850 12412 16747 18397 20542
Std. Deviation 382 624 579 276 438
Std Dev Pct 3.88% 5.03% 3.45% 1.50% 2.13%

For more coverage of CES 2017, click on the CES2017 tag.

Last updated by Dan Rosenbaum on February 1, 2017.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Google
  • Email

Related

Filed Under: General News, Trends Tagged With: apple, apple watch, CES2017, fitbit, garmin, samsung

← Garmin Launches New Fenix 5 Line: CES Is a Fitbit Smartwatch Coming? Sure Looks Like It: CES →

Subscribe To Our Weekly Newsletter

Subscribe now to the Wearable Tech Insider's weekly news blast. You'll get links to the top half-dozen stories in the world of wearable tech, optimized for quick reading. It's the best way to read the Wearable Tech Insider; it's free and you can change your mind any time. And, of course, we'll never sell your name or e-mail address...

Search This Site

Recent Posts

New Use Case for Apple Watch: Red Sox Stealing Signs

Fossil Debuts Two Android Wear Smartwatches

Garmin Shows Three New Fitness Bands at IFA

Fitbit Ionic: Minimal Acceptable Product?

Intel (Finally) Ditches Wearables for AR

Don’t Believe Everything You Read: Wearables Are Far From Dead

Eyes F.lashing Before Your Life

Smarty Pants: Nadi X Yoga Leggings

Rings: How Smart Can They Be?

Upskill Closes Series B Financing, But Won’t Say How Much

Stories from Health Tech Insider

  • Digital Apps Work Better for Weight Loss
  • New Study Shows More Consumers Adopted Digital Health in 2020
  • Machine Learning Could Make Early Autism Diagnosis Possible
  • New Smart Hearing Aids Run Up to 61 Hours Per Charge
  • Amazon Picked as Greatest Impact on Healthcare
  • Seniors Are Safer With Help from New Remote Monitor System

Topics

2013 android android wear apple apple watch apx labs basis battery CES ces2016 CES2017 epson finance fitbit fitness fossil fuelband garmin gear glass google healthkit intel iWatch jawbone LG market research microsoft misfit MWC15 nfc nike omate omsignal pebble recon samsung smartwatch sony sports tizen vuzix withings wristware wristwear

Sign up for Wearable Tech Insider

First name
Last name
* = required field

powered by MailChimp!

Subscribe now to the Wearable Tech Insider's weekly news blast. You'll get links to the top half-dozen stories in the world of wearable tech, optimized for quick reading. It's the best way to read the Wearable Tech Insider; it's free and you can change your mind any time. And, of course, we'll never sell your name or e-mail address...

Made in New York
Wearable Tech Insider is proud to be Made in NY.

All text © 2015 Center Ring Media

Privacy Policy

Center Ring Media Sites

Wearable Tech Insider
Seniortech Insider
Health Tech Insider

Copyright 2016 Center Ring Media | Site by JRMC

loading Cancel
Post was not sent - check your email addresses!
Email check failed, please try again
Sorry, your blog cannot share posts by email.