• Home
  • Trends
  • Company News
  • Product News
  • Fashion
  • Podcast
  • Events
  • About
  • Contact
  • May 9, 2025

Wearable Tech Insider

The Inside Word on Wearables and Wearable Technology

You are here: Home / Fashion / NYTimes Apple Watch Review: Rough and Revolutionary

NYTimes Apple Watch Review: Rough and Revolutionary

April 8, 2015 By Dan Rosenbaum

three apple watchWe suspect that the New York Times jumped the gun this morning by publishing a full-on review of the Apple Watch, [UPDATE: other outlets have been publishing reviews today, too] even though Apple won’t even start taking orders for it until Friday. On balance, though, we don’t think Apple will complain too much.

Tech columnist Farhad Manjoo pretty much ratified Apple’s aims for the gadget:

… the Watch became something like a natural extension of my body — a direct link, in a way that I’ve never felt before, from the digital world to my brain.

But it took a few days to get there. Manjoo talked about it taking time to learn the interface, figure out how to get just the right notifications to appear, and understand how the watch would fit into his life. And at this (early) point, he described most of the third-party apps as “useless.” But he raved about the haptics, and the different feels of different types of notifications. Apple Pay worked well, Siri much less so, and he had some issues with the design of some applications. Then there was this:

What’s most thrilling about the Apple Watch, unlike other smartwatches I’ve tried, is the way it invests a user with a general sense of empowerment… [T]he Watch builds the digital world directly into your skin. It takes some time getting used to, but once it clicks, this is a power you can’t live without.

And that’s a triumph of design, and of the seamless experience of hardware and software. You’ll probably see that last phrase in ads.

Now let’s see that the market thinks.

 

Last updated by Dan Rosenbaum on February 1, 2017.

Share this:

  • Facebook
  • Twitter
  • LinkedIn
  • Reddit
  • Email

Related

Filed Under: Fashion, General News, Product News, Reviews Tagged With: apple, apple watch, NYTimes, wristware

← Diamond-Encrusted Apple Watches, In Case $17,000 Is Too Little To Spend Apple Watch Review Roundup: This One Will Take Some Getting Used To (Updated) →

Recent Posts

New Use Case for Apple Watch: Red Sox Stealing Signs

Fossil Debuts Two Android Wear Smartwatches

Garmin Shows Three New Fitness Bands at IFA

Fitbit Ionic: Minimal Acceptable Product?

Intel (Finally) Ditches Wearables for AR

Don’t Believe Everything You Read: Wearables Are Far From Dead

Eyes F.lashing Before Your Life

Smarty Pants: Nadi X Yoga Leggings

Rings: How Smart Can They Be?

Upskill Closes Series B Financing, But Won’t Say How Much

Stories from Health Tech Insider

  • Remote Monitoring Drives New Personalized Treatment for Chronic Breathing Problems
  • Wearable Technology Listens for Knee Damage [video]
  • New Bandages Promise Faster Healing for Stubborn Wounds
  • CVS Acquires Telehealth Service to Bring Healthcare to the Home
  • Masimo’s New Smartwatch Addresses Privacy Concerns
  • Continuous Real-Time Diagnostics On the Go [video]

Topics

2013 android android wear apple apple watch apx labs basis battery CES ces2016 CES2017 epson finance fitbit fitness fossil fuelband garmin gear glass google healthkit intel iWatch jawbone LG market research microsoft misfit MWC15 nfc nike omate omsignal pebble recon samsung smartwatch sony sports tizen vuzix withings wristware wristwear

Copyright 2016 Center Ring Media | Site by JRMC